DOE v. SWARTHMORE COLLEGE
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO LIFT SEAL IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE SEAL PREVIOUSLY PLACED ON DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE SHALL BE LIFTED, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 3), PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 12), AND PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 21), ALL OF WHICH SHALL REMAIN UNDER SEAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT IN ALL PUBLICLY FILED DOCUMENTS THE PARTIES SHALL CONTINUE TO REFER TO THE COMPAINANT AS "JANE DOE" AND USE PSEUDONYMS FOR NON-PARTY SWARTHMORE STUDENTS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/27/2017. 7/28/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUL 2 8 20\7
AND NOW, this
KATE BARKMAN • Cle&erk
day of July, 2017, upon
consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Seal, Defendant's
Response thereto, and Plaintiff's Reply in Further Support
thereof, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part. The seal previously placed on documents
in this case shall be LIFTED, with the exception of Plaintiff's
Original Complaint (Doc. No. 3), Plaintiff's Amended Complaint
(Doc. No. 12), and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No.
21), all of which shall remain under seal.
It is further ORDERED that in all publicly filed documents
the parties shall continue to refer to the complainant as "Jane
Doe" and use pseudonyms for non-party Swarthmore students
involved in this case.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?