EADDY v. GLUNT et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE PETITION IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALLMARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/29/16. 6/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
REGINALD EADDY,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1399

v.
STEVEN GLUNT et al.,
Respondents.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of June 2016, upon consideration of Petitioner’s pro se
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (Doc. No. 13), Petitioner’s Reply to the Response (Doc. No. 14), Magistrate Judge Lynne
A. Sitarski’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 25), Petitioner’s Objection to the Report
and Recommendation (Doc. No. 16), Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Petition (Doc.
No. 18), and the pertinent state court record, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court
issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.
3. The Motion for Leave to Amend the Petition (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED.
4. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not made
a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that
reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000).

5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.