RICE v. GRIMM BROTHERS REALTY COMPANY et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT DEFT SETH DANIELS, ESQ.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 3) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC.SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 1/21/16.1/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES.(kw, ) Modified on 1/22/2016 (kw, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MADELINE RICE,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
GRIMM BROTHERS REALTY
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-1405

ORDER
AND NOW, this __21st___ day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Seth
Daniels, Esquire’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 5),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15
U.S.C. §§ 1692e(2)(A) and 1692f(1) and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit
Extension Uniformity Act provisions.
2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15 U.S.C.
§§ 1692e(10) and 1692g and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension
Uniformity Act provisions.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
_________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.