RICE v. GRIMM BROTHERS REALTY COMPANY et al
ORDER THAT DEFT SETH DANIELS, ESQ.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 3) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC.SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 1/21/16.1/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES.(kw, ) Modified on 1/22/2016 (kw, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GRIMM BROTHERS REALTY
COMPANY, et al.,
AND NOW, this __21st___ day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Seth
Daniels, Esquire’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 5),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15
U.S.C. §§ 1692e(2)(A) and 1692f(1) and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit
Extension Uniformity Act provisions.
2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED insofar as the Complaint alleges violations of 15 U.S.C.
§§ 1692e(10) and 1692g and the accompanying Pennsylvania Fair Credit Extension
Uniformity Act provisions.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?