RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 34) IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, KELLY MULLAN, IS DISMISSED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B). JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, RONALD PHILLIPS, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 10/11/16. 10/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, E-MAILED.(er, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY,
RONALD PHILLIPS (Medical Director) and
KELLY MULLAN (Physician Assistant),
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-1461
AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2016, after considering the motion for summary
judgment filed by the defendant, Ronald Phillips (Medical Director), (Doc. No. 34), the pro se
plaintiff’s response in opposition to the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 43), and the
various documents attached thereto; accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed
memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED;
The plaintiff’s claim against the defendant, Kelly Mullan, is DISMISSED under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B);
Judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the defendant, Ronald Phillips, and
against the plaintiff, Robert Marquis Ramey; and
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?