PEREZ v. CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC. et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS 82 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED; THE COURTS JULY 26, 2017 RULING IS VACATED; WHI AZELES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO TESTIFY WITH CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/10/17. 8/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY
OF LABOR, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
CENTRAL LAUNDRY INC., GEORGE
RENGEPES and JIMMY RENGEPES,
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion
for Reconsideration (ECF #82) of the Court’s July 26, 2017 ruling from the bench that Wage and
Hour Investigator (“WHI”) Jennifer Azeles’s testimony regarding her calculation of back wages
and liquidated damages under the FLSA required expert qualification pursuant to Fed. R. Evid.
702, and the Defendants’ Response thereto (ECF #83), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED;
(2) The Court’s July 26, 2017 ruling is VACATED;
(3) WHI Azeles shall be permitted to testify with consistent with the accompanying
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wendy Beetlestone
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?