ROBINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al

Filing 11

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS DENIED. COUNT ONE OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND COUNT TWO IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF HAS TWENTY (20) DAYS IN WHICH TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/13/15. 10/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FREDDIE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-1574

ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant City of
Philadelphia (“Defendant”)’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) and Plaintiff Freddie Robinson
(“Plaintiff”)’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 9), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s request for oral argument is DENIED;
2. Count One of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE; and
3. Count Two of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. Plaintiff has twenty (20) days in which to file a Second Amended Complaint.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:

_s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter ___
___
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.