BUSH v. CAMERON et al
Filing
13
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS COROUS IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/22/16. 6/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TYREE BUSH,
Petitioner,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1596
v.
SUPT. KENNETH CAMERON, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of June 2016, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. No. 10), to which no objections have been filed,
it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski
(Doc. No. 10) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis
contained in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, as approved and
adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in
denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000); and
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?