FINNERMAN v. SEPTA et al

Filing 101

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE 88 IS DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW 92 IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/13/2018. 04/13/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NASIR FINNEMEN, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. SEPTA, et al. Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-1654 O R D E R AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2018, after the conclusion of trial, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion in limine (ECF No. 88) is DENIED as moot. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (ECF No. 92) is DENIED as moot. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?