FINNERMAN v. SEPTA et al

Filing 71

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM 70 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT YERKE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 63 IS GRANTED. THE SEPTA DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 62 IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANTS CABAN AND BOYD AND DENIED AS TO DEFENDANT CAMPBELL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 07/25/2017. 07/25/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NASIR FINNERMAN, : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. SEPTA, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-1654 O R D E R AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2017, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, the following is hereby ORDERED: (1) Defendant Michelle Yerkes’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED. (2) The SEPTA Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED as to Defendants Caban and Boyd and DENIED as to Defendant Campbell. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?