ASHTON WOODS HOLDINGS L.L.C. et al v. USG CORPORATION et al
Filing
445
ORDER THAT HOMEBUILDER PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT DAVID HALL IS GRANTED. HOMEBUILDER PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT DR. ROBERT WILLIG IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF HOMEBUILDER PLAINTIFFS' EXPERT DR. DANIEL INGBERMAN IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/6/2020. 4/7/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE DOC 929 IN 13-MD-2437)(kp, )(
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: DOMESTIC DRYWALL
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
CIVIL ACTION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
MDL No. 13-2437
Ashton Woods Holdings LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
15-cv-1712
v.
USG Corp., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE: DAUBERT MOTIONS
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2020, upon consideration of Homebuilder Plaintiffs’
Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Defendants’ Expert, David Hall, (ECF 321), Homebuilder
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Defendants’ Expert, Dr. Robert Willig, (ECF 320),
and Defendants’ Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Homebuilder Plaintiffs’ Expert, Dr. Daniel
Ingberman, (ECF 319), the responses and replies thereto, oral argument, and the supplemental
materials submitted by the parties, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. Homebuilder Plaintiffs’ Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Defendants’ Expert, David
Hall, (ECF 321), is GRANTED.
2. Homebuilder Plaintiffs’ Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Defendants’ Expert, Dr.
Robert Willig, (ECF 320), is DENIED.
3. Defendants’ Motion to Preclude the Testimony of Homebuilder Plaintiffs’ Expert, Dr.
Daniel Ingberman, (ECF 319), is DENIED.
1
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael M. Baylson
Dated: April 6, 2020
_________________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
United States District Court Judge
O:\13-MD-2437 - drywall\15cv1712 Order re Daubert Motions.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?