TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
44
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 24) IS GRANTED; DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 25) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 18) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 2/3/16. 2/4/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES TALBERT,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1718
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, upon consideration of defendant City
of Philadelphia’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 24), defendant Adam Jackson, Tami Levin,
and R. Seth Williams’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 25), the plaintiff’s response (Doc. No.
27) and the plaintiff’s response (Doc. No. 30), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant City of Philadelphia’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 24) is
GRANTED.
2.
Defendant Adam Jackson, Tami Levin, and R. Seth Williams’ motion to
dismiss (Doc. No. 25) is GRANTED.
3.
The plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. No. 18) is DISMISSED with
prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?