RUSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 98

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO RESTRICT TESTIMONY OF DRS. FREESE, HELLMAN, MANION, AND INGRAM, PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 11/8/17. 11/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT S. EVANS,
Administrator of the Estate
of Damon Sheron Rush,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1839

ORDER
AND NOW, this __8th___ day of November, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant
United States of America’s Motion in Limine to Restrict Testimony of Drs. Freese, Hellman,
Manion, and Ingram (ECF No. 78), Plaintiff’s response thereto (ECF No. 90), and Defendant’s
Reply (ECF No. 92), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion
is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. The Motion is DENIED as it relates to Defendant’s request that the Court exclude
the opinion of Andrew Freese, M.D.;
2. The Motion is GRANTED as it relates to Defendant’s request that the Court exclude
the opinion of Fredric N. Hellman, M.D., regarding the causal link between
Decedent’s death and the 2013 accident;
3. The Motion is DENIED as it relates to Defendant’s request that the Court exclude the
opinion of William L. Manion, M.D.; and

4. The Motion is DENIED as it relates to Defendant’s request that the Court exclude the
opinion of William T. Ingram, M.D. 1

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
___________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

1

This Order accompanies the Court’s Memorandum dated November _____, 2017.