PAZ v. HUGHES et al
Filing
27
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 19) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S ENDS OF JUSTICE MOTION (DOCKET NO. 23) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CLARIFY PLAINTIFF'S POSITION (DOCKET NO. 17) IS DEEMED MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS INSTRUCTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/25/16. 10/27/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NICHOLAS PAZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
RENEE CARDWELL HUGHES, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1846
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2016, in consideration of Defendants Lance Cole,
Harry Lapin, Charles Samuels, and Susan Walters’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19), and
response thereto (Docket No. 25), as well as Plaintiff’s Ends of Justice Motion to Transfer
(Docket No. 23), it is hereby ORDERED that
1.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 19) is GRANTED and that all
claims against Defendants Lance Cole, Harry Lapin, Charles Samuels, and Susan Walters are
DISMISSED without prejudice;
2.
Plaintiff’s Ends of Justice Motion (Docket No. 23), seeking to transfer this action
is DENIED with prejudice.
3.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Clarify Plaintiff’s Position (Docket No. 17) is DEEMED
MOOT.
The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case for all purposes, including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?