PRICE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 30

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN RESEPCT TO ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT JAMES LITTLE. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMARY JUDGMENT IS GRATNED WITH RESEPCT TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DE FENDANT TYRONE SIMMONS, ETC. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED WITH RESEPCT TO PLAITNIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST OFFICER SIMMONS IN COUNT TWO AND COUNT THREE, ETC. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND OR DENY DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 23 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 03/07/2017. 03/07/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE LITIGANT AND E-MAILED.(nds, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CLYDE PRICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-1909

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2017, upon
consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 19), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part, as follows:
1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is

GRANTED with respect to all of Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendant James Little.
2.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is

GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant
Tyrone Simmons (“Officer Simmons”) in Counts One, Four, Five,
Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, and Twelve of Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint (ECF No. 11).

3.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED

with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Officer Simmons in
Count Two and Count Three of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.
4.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike and or Deny

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) is DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.