WARREN et al v. JOHNSON MATTHEY, INC. et al
Filing
53
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. 11 , 17 , 18 , 33 ) ARE GRANTED. COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJDUICE. THE COURT WILL NOT EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS' REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS. COUNTS III-VIII ARE ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/19/2016. 1/19/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRADLEY WARREN and PAULA GAY
WARREN,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-01919
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHNSON MATTHEY, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants Johnson
Matthey, Inc. (“Johnson Matthey”), Whittaker Corp. (“Whittaker”), Marcegaglia USA, Inc.
(“Marcegaglia”) and Constitution Drive Partners, L.P.’s (“Constitution Drive”) Motions to
Dismiss (ECF Nos. 11, 17, 18, 33), Plaintiffs’ Responses (ECF Nos. 19, 21, 22, 37) and the
parties’ Supplemental Briefs (ECF Nos. 49, 50), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are
GRANTED.
Counts I and II of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. The
Court will not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims
against Defendants. Counts III–VIII are accordingly DISMISSED without prejudice.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?