WARREN et al v. JOHNSON MATTHEY, INC. et al

Filing 53

ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. 11 , 17 , 18 , 33 ) ARE GRANTED. COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJDUICE. THE COURT WILL NOT EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS' REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS. COUNTS III-VIII ARE ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/19/2016. 1/19/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRADLEY WARREN and PAULA GAY WARREN, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-01919 Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON MATTHEY, INC. et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants Johnson Matthey, Inc. (“Johnson Matthey”), Whittaker Corp. (“Whittaker”), Marcegaglia USA, Inc. (“Marcegaglia”) and Constitution Drive Partners, L.P.’s (“Constitution Drive”) Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 11, 17, 18, 33), Plaintiffs’ Responses (ECF Nos. 19, 21, 22, 37) and the parties’ Supplemental Briefs (ECF Nos. 49, 50), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED. Counts I and II of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court will not exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims against Defendants. Counts III–VIII are accordingly DISMISSED without prejudice. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?