FINIZIE v. MCDONALD

Filing 38

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/30/17. 6/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHARON A. FINIZIE,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT A. MCDONALD,
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-2050

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2017, upon
consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1), Defendant’s
Answer (ECF No. 4), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 29), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32), and Defendant’s Motion
for Leave to File a Reply Brief (ECF No. 36), it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.

29) is GRANTED.
2.

Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED

with prejudice.
3.

Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply

Brief (ECF No. 36) is DENIED as moot. 1

1

The Court considered the contents of the proposed

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as
CLOSED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

reply brief, attached as Exhibit A (ECF No. 36-1), in reaching
its decision to grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
2