FINIZIE v. MCDONALD
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/30/17. 6/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHARON A. FINIZIE,
ROBERT A. MCDONALD,
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2017, upon
consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1), Defendant’s
Answer (ECF No. 4), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 29), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 32), and Defendant’s Motion
for Leave to File a Reply Brief (ECF No. 36), it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
29) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED
Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply
Brief (ECF No. 36) is DENIED as moot. 1
The Court considered the contents of the proposed
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
reply brief, attached as Exhibit A (ECF No. 36-1), in reaching
its decision to grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?