VOLLMAR v. SPS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Filing 48

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 22) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 23) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/2/16. 12/2/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JUDITH F. VOLLMAR Plaintiff, v. SPS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Defendant. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 15-2087 ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2016, in consideration of Defendant SPS Technologies, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) and Plaintiff Judith Vollmar’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 24, 25, 28, and 29), and following oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?