VOLLMAR v. SPS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Filing
48
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 22) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 23) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/2/16. 12/2/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUDITH F. VOLLMAR
Plaintiff,
v.
SPS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 15-2087
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2016, in consideration of Defendant SPS
Technologies, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) and Plaintiff Judith
Vollmar’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), responses thereto (Doc. Nos.
24, 25, 28, and 29), and following oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED;
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?