ROSCOE v. WATCO COMPANIES, LLC et al
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 20 ), IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 12/16/2016. 12/20/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DENNIS ROSCOE,
Plaintiff,
v.
WATCO COMPANIES, LLC, et al.
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO.: 15-2118
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (Dkt No. 20), including Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Material
Facts, Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt
No. 21), including Plaintiff’s Counter-Statement of Undisputed Material Facts and Statement of
Material Disputed Facts, and Defendants’ Reply (Dkt No. 25), including Defendants’ Response
to Plaintiff’s Statement of Material Disputed Facts, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED
in part;
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s 42
U.S.C. § 1981 claim of race discrimination;
3. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s 42
U.S.C. § 1981 claim of retaliation.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
C. Darnell Jones, II
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?