KUBIS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS et al

Filing 59

ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM ACCOMPANYING THIS ORDER. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2253(C) BECAUSE REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD N OT DEBATE THE PROPRIETY OF THIS COURTS PROCEDURAL RULING WITH RESPECT TO THESE CLAIMS. SEE SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/31/20. 7/31/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )

Case 2:15-cv-02142-WB Document 59 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GEORGE VINCENT KUBIS,
Petitioner,
v.
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
BUCKS COUNTY, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION 15-CV-2142

ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2020, in consideration of Petitioner George Vincent
Kubis’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (ECF No. 49), it is
ORDERED that:
1.

The Motion is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction for the reasons set forth in the

Court’s Memorandum accompanying this Order.
2.

A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural ruling with
respect to these claims. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

BY THE COURT:

_/s/ Wendy Beetlestone
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.