LYSZKOWSKI v. GIBBONS et al

Filing 34

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE AS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT, AND CANNOT, AFTER THREE ATTEMPTS, STATE PLAUSIBLE CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIMS AGAINST JUDGE GIBBONS, PROTHONOTARY BRAMBLETT OR OFFICER SILVESTRI WH ICH OVERCOME THEIR JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL IMMUNITY FOR ACTS ENTIRELY RELATING TO THEIR ROLE AS JUDICIAL OFFICERS IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 3/23/16. 3/23/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO LYSZKOWSKI.(fdc) Modified on 3/23/2016 (lisad, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION

BRIAN JOSEPH LYSZKOWSKI

v.
N0.15-2210

DIANE E. GIBBONS, LISA ANNE
SILVESTRI, and KAREN REID
BRAMBLETT
ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March 2016, upon consideration of Judge Gibbons' and
Prothonotary Bramblett's Motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (ECF Doc. No. 28),
Officer Silvestri's Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 30), Plaintiff's Oppositions (ECF Doc.
Nos. 31 & 32), consistent with our February 2, 2016 Order (ECF Doc. No. 20) and for the
reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motions (ECF Doc.
Nos. 28 & 30) are GRANTED with prejudice as Plaintiff has not, and cannot, after three
attempts, state plausible civil rights claims against Judge Gibbons, Prothonotary Bramblett or
Officer Silvestri which overcome their judicial and quasi-judicial immunity for acts entirely
relating to their role as judicial officers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Clerk of Court shall close this case.