KING v. U.S. XPRESS, INC. et al

Filing 33

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS U.S. XPRESS, INC. AND MOUNTAIN LAKE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC. AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF FATAI KING. THE CLERK'S OFFICE SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/1/2016. 9/1/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ahf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FATAI KING,
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. XPRESS, INC.,
MOUNTAIN LAKE RISK RETENTION
GROUP, INC.
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Civ. No. 15-2270

ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Second
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 28), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 29), Defendants’
Reply (Doc. No. 31), and all related submissions, and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants U.S. Xpress, Inc. and Mountain Lake Risk Retention
Group, Inc. and against Plaintiff Fatai King.
The Clerk’s Office shall CLOSE this case for statistical purposes.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
___________________
September 1, 2016

Paul S. Diamond, J.