JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al

Filing 71

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 10/31/2016. 10/31/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NATHANIEL J. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING
AUTHORITY,
Defendant.

NO. 15-2343

ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant
Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 56); Plaintiff
Nathaniel Johnson’s Response in Opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 64 and 67); and Defendant’s
Reply in Support thereof (ECF Nos. 68 & 69), and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s
Opinion of October 31, 2016 (ECF No. 70), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
(1) Defendant’s motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s
disparate treatment and retaliation claims based on age and race, and
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR of Defendant Philadelphia
Housing Authority, and AGAINST Plaintiff Nathaniel Johnson on all
of Plaintiff’s claims for disparate treatment and retaliation;
(2) Defendant’s motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s age- and
race-based hostile work environment claims.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Wendy Beetlestone
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.