ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Filing
34
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY IS OBLIGATED TO DEFEND RITTENSHOUSE CLARIDGE, LP IN THE CIVIL ACTION STYLED AS CORADO V. RITTENHOUSE CLARIDGE, ET AL, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SEPTEMBER TERM 2013, NO. 01179. DEFENDANT INDIAN HARBOR'S MOTION IS DENIED. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY IS OBLIGATED TO REIMBURSE PLAINTIFF FOR ALL COSTS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/21/17. 2/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY, Individually and as Subrogee of
Rittenhouse Claridge, LP
v.
INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY,
ET AL.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-2344
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st
day of
February
, 2017, upon consideration of
Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Indian Harbor (ECF No. 20) and
Defendant Indian Harbor’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24), and all
documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. Indian Harbor Insurance Company is obligated
to defend Rittenhouse Claridge, LP in the civil action styled as Corado v.
Rittenhouse Claridge, et al, Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas,
September Term 2013, No. 01179.
2.
Defendant Indian Harbor’s Motion is DENIED.
3.
Indian Harbor Insurance Company is obligated to reimburse Plaintiff for all costs,
expenses, and attorneys’ fees incurred and/or expended by or on behalf of
Rittenhouse Claridge, LP in Corado v. Rittenhouse Claridge, et al, Philadelphia
County Court of Common Pleas, September Term 2013, No. 01179.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
_________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?