ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY et al

Filing 34

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY IS OBLIGATED TO DEFEND RITTENSHOUSE CLARIDGE, LP IN THE CIVIL ACTION STYLED AS CORADO V. RITTENHOUSE CLARIDGE, ET AL, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SEPTEMBER TERM 2013, NO. 01179. DEFENDANT INDIAN HARBOR'S MOTION IS DENIED. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY IS OBLIGATED TO REIMBURSE PLAINTIFF FOR ALL COSTS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 2/21/17. 2/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Individually and as Subrogee of Rittenhouse Claridge, LP v. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2344 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of February , 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Indian Harbor (ECF No. 20) and Defendant Indian Harbor’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. Indian Harbor Insurance Company is obligated to defend Rittenhouse Claridge, LP in the civil action styled as Corado v. Rittenhouse Claridge, et al, Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, September Term 2013, No. 01179. 2. Defendant Indian Harbor’s Motion is DENIED. 3. Indian Harbor Insurance Company is obligated to reimburse Plaintiff for all costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees incurred and/or expended by or on behalf of Rittenhouse Claridge, LP in Corado v. Rittenhouse Claridge, et al, Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, September Term 2013, No. 01179. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: _________________________ R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?