FISCHER v. PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP

Filing 43

ORDER THAT PEPPER HAMILTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PEPPER AND AGAINST FISCHER ON THOSE PORTIONS OF COUNTS I AND II OF FISCHER'S AMENDED COMPLAINT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/29/2016. 1/29/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDREW FISCHER,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-02413

v.
PEPPER HAMILTON, LLP,
Defendant.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of Pepper Hamilton,
LLP’s (“Pepper”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16), Andrew Fischer’s (“Fischer”)
Response (ECF No. 18), Pepper’s Reply (ECF No. 19), Fischer’s Sur-Reply (ECF No. 22) and
the parties’ Supplemental Briefs on Fischer’s Interactive Process claim (ECF Nos. 28, 30), it is
hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Judgment is entered in favor of Pepper and against Fischer on those portions of Counts I
and II of Fischer’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15) that allege: (1) failure to engage in the
interactive process; (2) intentional disability discrimination; and (3) retaliation.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

1