TAYLOR v. COLVIN
Filing
15
ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REMOVED FROM SUSPENSE. THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 13) IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; ROBINSON'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW (DOC. 9) IS GRANTED IN PART; THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. SEC. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/12/16. 8/12/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VAUGHN C. TAYLOR
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Administration
CIVIL ACTION
No. 15-2515
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Vaughn C.
Taylor’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, the Commissioner of
Social Security’s response thereto, and Plaintiff’s reply, and after careful review of the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, to which no
objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:
1. This case is REMOVED from suspense;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Document 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3. Robinson’s Request for Review (Document 9) is GRANTED in part;
4. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
1
The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on June 30, 2016, together
with a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any
objections within fourteen days after service of the Notice. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b)
(“Any party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report
under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) . . . within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy
thereof.”). As of today’s date, no objections have been filed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?