LEE v. AMR CORPORATION
Filing
14
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE REQUEST FOR COUNSEL FEES IS DENIED. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/7/15. 10/8/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SANGMI LEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMR CORPORATION, a/k/a d/b/a
AMERICAN AIRLINES,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-2666
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment on September 3, 2015, to which as
of the date of this memorandum, no response has been filed.
A review of defendant’s memorandum in support of its motion discloses that there is no
issue as to any material facts.
By virtue of her failure to answer defendant’s request for admissions, plaintiff has
admitted that she cannot sustain her claim for damages. Moreover, plaintiff has admitted she did
not check the travel documentation requirements for the flight and was in fact refunded $257.75
for the ticket fee charges she incurred.
An order follows:
AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s lack of response, and a review of the memorandum in support
thereof, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED. Judgment is
entered in favor of Defendant AMR Corporation a/k/a d/b/a American Airlines and against
Plaintiff Sangmi Lee
The Request for Counsel Fees is DENIED.
This case is CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S. J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?