LEE v. AMR CORPORATION

Filing 14

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE REQUEST FOR COUNSEL FEES IS DENIED. THIS CASE IS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/7/15. 10/8/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SANGMI LEE, Plaintiff, v. AMR CORPORATION, a/k/a d/b/a AMERICAN AIRLINES, Defendant. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2666 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment on September 3, 2015, to which as of the date of this memorandum, no response has been filed. A review of defendant’s memorandum in support of its motion discloses that there is no issue as to any material facts. By virtue of her failure to answer defendant’s request for admissions, plaintiff has admitted that she cannot sustain her claim for damages. Moreover, plaintiff has admitted she did not check the travel documentation requirements for the flight and was in fact refunded $257.75 for the ticket fee charges she incurred. An order follows: AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s lack of response, and a review of the memorandum in support thereof, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant AMR Corporation a/k/a d/b/a American Airlines and against Plaintiff Sangmi Lee The Request for Counsel Fees is DENIED. This case is CLOSED. BY THE COURT: Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S. J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?