DREW v. WETZEL
Filing
26
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 21 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/10/2017. 04/11/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE LITIGANT AND E-MAILED.(nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS DREW,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Petitioner,
v.
JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.,
Respondents.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-2725
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2017, after review of the
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (ECF
No. 21), and Petitioner’s objections thereto (ECF No. 24), and for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
as follows:
(1)
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is APPROVED and
ADOPTED;
(2)
Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 24) are OVERRULED;
(3)
The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1)
DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
(4)
A certificate of appealability shall NOT issue; and
(4)
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.
is
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?