CONNEARNEY v. MAIN LINE HOSPITALS, INC. et al

Filing 108

ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/04/2016. 11/04/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTINA K. CONNEARNEY,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
No. 15-02730

v.
MAIN LINE HOSPITALS, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
PAPPERT, J.

NOVEMBER 4, 2016
ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff’s Family Psychiatric History (ECF No.
59) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine as to the Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Clauses in
Settlement Agreements (ECF No. 60) is DENIED as moot.
3. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Discipline of Other Employees in
the Protected Class (ECF No. 61) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to opinion
testimony from employees within the protected class regarding Hogan’s motivations for
disciplining them. The witnesses may testify about being disciplined by Hogan but may
not opine on Hogan’s motivations for doing so.
4. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence and Arguments Relating to Main
Line Hospital’s e-Feedback System (ECF No. 62) is GRANTED.
5. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Connearney from Referring to Various Actions
as “Adverse Employment Actions” (ECF No. 63) is DENIED as moot.

15

6. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Discipline of Employees Outside
the Protected Class (ECF No. 64) is GRANTED.
7. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Letters of Recommendation (ECF No. 65) is
GRANTED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

16