TOK v. GLUNT et al

Filing 23

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 11 , AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE M. FAITH ANGELL 20 , TO WHICH NO OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED, IT IS ORDERED THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 2/22/16. 2/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHANTHA J. TOK,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-2794

v.
STEVEN R. GLUNT, et al.,
Respondents.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February 2016, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ
of Habeas Corpus (Doc. Nos. 1, 11), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell (Doc. No. 20), to which no objections have been
filed, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell
(Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;
3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis
contained in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, as approved and
adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in
denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000); and
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.