MONTGOMERY v. LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al

Filing 13

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AGAINST THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, LABORERS LOCAL 332, SAMUEL STATEN, JR., AND CORY ROBINSO N PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) IS DENIED. DEFENDNATS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT AGAINST RYAN N. BOYER PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(6) IS GRANTED; AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 101(a)(5) AND 609 OF THE LABOR MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 7/27/2015. 7/27/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ahf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMERE MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-02815 v. LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7), Plaintiff’s opposition thereto (ECF No. 8), Defendants’ reply (ECF No. 9), and Plaintiff’s surreply (ECF No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. It is FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against the Laborers’ District Council of Philadelphia and Vicinity, Laborers Local 332, Samuel Staten, Jr., and Cory Robinson pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is DENIED; 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against Ryan N. Boyer pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED; and 3. Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants pursuant to Sections 101(a)(5) and 609 of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 411(a)(5), 529, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?