YOUNG v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS SAFETY SERVICES et al

Filing 9

ORDER THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. COUNTS I, II, THE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIMS, AND COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS AGAINST TEMPLE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS SAFETY SERVICES AND TEMPLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT (TEMPLE UNIVERSITY) ONLY.1 ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 20, 2015, PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THAT CURES THE DEFICIENCIES IN THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 10/28/2015. 10/28/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKEYSHA YOUNG
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
SAFETY SERVICES, et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-2892

ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of “Temple University’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint,” (Docket No. 4) and Plaintiff’s response thereto, and
for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as
follows:
1.

The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

2.

Counts I, II, the “Supplemental Claims,” and Count III of the Complaint are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as against Temple University Campus
Safety Services and Temple University Police Department (“Temple University”)
only. 1 On or before November 20, 2015, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint
that cures the deficiencies in the Complaint.
BY THE COURT:
/s/John R. Padova
__________________
John R. Padova, J.

1

Counts I, II, and the “Supplemental Claims” assert causes of action as against Temple
University only. Count III appears to assert a claim against Temple University and Defendant
Ama Jones. Defendants did not move to dismiss Count III as against Defendant Ama Jones.