PETRO-RYDER v. PITTMAN et al

Filing 56

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 28 , IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION 28 IS GRANTED AS PLAINTIFF CANNOT SHOW GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT PRECLUDING THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/11/15. 12/11/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROSEMARY PETRO-RYDER
v.

CIVIL ACTION

N0.15-2908

CAPT. JACQUELINE PITTMAN et al

ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of December 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion

for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 28), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 34), following
oral argument and as described in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED
Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 28) is GRANTED as Plaintiff cannot show genuine issues
of material fact precluding the entry of judgment as a matter of law dismissing her claims for
race and gender discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment or equal protection. The
Clerk of Court shall close this case.