MCGLONE v. PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS
ORDER GRANTING 37 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 44 ) IS GRANTED AND PGWS MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL AND RESPONSIVE COUNTER STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS (ECF NO. 45 ) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/19/17. 1/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PATRICK MCGLONE, SR.
PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS, PGW
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2017, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
memorandum and upon consideration of Philadelphia Gas Works’ (“PGW”) Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 37) and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED
that the Motion is GRANTED and each of Plaintiff’s claims in his Amended Complaint (ECF
No. 7) is dismissed with prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Sur Reply in Opposition
to Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED and PGW’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s
Supplemental and Responsive Counter Statement of Undisputed Facts (ECF No. 45) is DENIED
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 15\15-3262 mcglone v. phila gas works\15cv3262 order re SJ.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?