FITZSIMMONS et al v. AETNA, INC. et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT. THE REMAINING MOTIONS ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/7/16. 1/8/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO MCCP, E-MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GREGORY FITZSIMMONS , ET AL.
AETNA, INC., ET AL.
AND NOW, this 7th
day of January , 2016, upon consideration of Defendants
Timothy Kelly’s and Kelly and Associates’ Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) (ECF No. 5), Defendant Aetna, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for failure to state
a claim (ECF No. 6), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 8), and
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand (ECF No. 9), and all documents submitted in support thereof, and
in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand is GRANTED. This
matter is REMANDED to the Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Magisterial District Court.
The remaining Motions are DISMISSED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?