MILAS v. OVERMEYER et al
Filing
29
ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION (DOC. NO. 27) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/28/20. 9/28/20 ENTERED AND COPIES(NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER) AND E-MAILED.(er, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES MILAS,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, SCI–Forest
Superintendent; THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA; and THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-3322
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2020, after considering the “Independent Action
Application for Relief to Re-Open Judgment, Pursuant to F.R.CIV.P. 60(b)(6)” filed by the pro se
movant, James Milas (Doc. No. 27); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed
memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The application (Doc. No. 27) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack
of subject-matter jurisdiction; and
2.
A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?