CHIMENTI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al

Filing 110

ORDER THAT DOC DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 95) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 7/12/18. 7/12/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SALVATORE CHIMENTI, ET AL. v. JOHN WETZEL, ET AL. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-3333 ORDER AND NOW, this day of July, 2018, upon consideration of the “DOC Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment” (Docket No. 95), and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The DOC Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the following: (1) Plaintiff Maldonado’s personal claim for injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Count I of the First Amended Complaint; (2) Plaintiffs’ claim for injunctive relief for violation of Article I, Section 13 of the Pennsylvania Constitution in Count II of the First Amended Complaint; and (3) that portion of Plaintiff Chimenti’s claim for medical malpractice in Count III of the First Amended Complaint that pertains to Dr. Bennet Cecil’s opinion that Plaintiff Chimenti’s diabetes is likely related to his HCV. 2. The DOC Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in all other respects. BY THE COURT: /s/ John R. Padova ____________________________ John R. Padova, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?