COLON v. FARRELL et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO FARRELL, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS K. BRADLEY, D. BANKS, AND J. LAWRENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC 1915(e). PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A FURTHER AMENDED COMPLAINT ON OR BEFROE 8/8/16. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/18/16. 7/19/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN,
AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Michele
Farrell’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, to which pro se Plaintiff Jeffrey Colon
has not responded to date, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is
ORDERED the Motion (Document 9) is GRANTED.
Colon’s Amended Complaint is
DISMISSED without prejudice as to Farrell.
Upon further review of Colon’s Amended Complaint and for the reasons stated in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is further ORDERED the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED
without prejudice as to Defendants K. Bradley, D. Banks, and J. Lawrence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Colon may file a further amended complaint to correct the deficiencies identified in the
accompanying Memorandum. Any further amended complaint shall be filed on or before August
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?