ORMAN et al v. CITIMORTGAGE et al

Filing 27

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 17 ) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ) ARE DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 4 ) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/21/16. 4/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS AND E-MAILED.(va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS A. ORMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-3432

v.
CITIMORTGAGE, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of April 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13), Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw Complaint (Doc. No. 17),
Defendants’ Responses in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw Complaint (Doc. Nos.
18, 24), Plaintiffs’ Replies to Defendants’ Opposition to the Motion to Withdraw (Doc. Nos. 22,
25), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Withdraw Complaint (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED.
2. Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13) are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.