THOMPSON v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE STRAWBRIDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 18) IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED; JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFT NANCY A. BERRYHILL & AGAINST PLFF ROBERTA LAJEAN THOMPSON; & THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/12/17. 7/13/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERTA LAJEAN THOMPSON,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David. R. Strawbridge (Doc. No. 18),
Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. No. 19), and the Commissioner’s Response (Doc. No. 20), and upon
an independent and thorough review of the administrate record in this case, it is ORDERED
Magistrate Judge Strawbridge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s request for review is DENIED;
Judgment is entered in favor of DEFENDANT NANCY A. BERRYHILL and
against Plaintiff Roberta Lajean Thompson; and
Nancy A. Berryhill is the acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.
Pursuant to Rule 24(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Ms. Berryhill replaces Carolyn
W. Colvin as Defendant in this case and no further action is needed to meet the requirement of
the final sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) which states:
Any action instituted in accordance with this subsection shall survive
notwithstanding any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner
of Social Security or any vacancy in such office.
The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?