MCNEAL et al v. ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC. et al
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO REMAND ARE GRANTED AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMAND THIS MATTER TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY AND MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/12/15. 11/12/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MATTHEW MCNEAL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-03517
v.
ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of Motions to
Remand filed by Matthew McNeal, Sean Flood, and Mark Tarloski (collectively “Plaintiffs”),
(ECF. Nos. 27, 31), and responses in opposition filed by Defendants ArcelorMittal USA, LLC
and ArcelorMittal Plate LLC (collectively “Defendants”), (ECF. Nos. 48, 49, 51, 52), as well as
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF. No. 4), Plaintiffs’ response in opposition, (ECF No. 50),
and Defendants’ reply (ECF No. 55), it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motions to Remand are
GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of Court shall REMAND this matter to the Court of Common Pleas of
Philadelphia County and mark this case as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?