MCNEAL et al v. ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC. et al

Filing 94

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO REMAND ARE GRANTED AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMAND THIS MATTER TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY AND MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 11/12/15. 11/12/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MATTHEW MCNEAL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-03534

v.

ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of Motions to
Remand filed by Matthew McNeal, Sean Flood, and Mark Tarloski (collectively “Plaintiffs”),
(ECF. Nos. 25, 29), and responses in opposition filed by Defendants ArcelorMittal USA, LLC
and ArcelorMittal Plate LLC (collectively “Defendants”), (ECF. Nos. 47, 48, 51, 52), as well as
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF. No. 3), Plaintiffs’ response in opposition, (ECF No. 49),
and Defendants’ reply (ECF No. 55), it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motions to Remand are
GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of Court shall REMAND this matter to the Court of Common Pleas of
Philadelphia County and mark this case as CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.