SOWELL v. RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD et al

Filing 30

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR UNOPPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD. IS GRANTED.JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST RAV AND IN FAVOR OF SOWELL FOR BACK PAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,614. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED A GAINST RAV AND IN FAVOR OF SOWELL FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,500. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST RAV AND IN FAVOR OF SOWELL FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/26/16. 5/26/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAMAR SOWELL, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-03657 v. RAV INVESTIGATIVE & SECURITY SERVICES, LTD, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff Lamar Sowell’s (“Sowell”) unopposed Motion for Default Judgment Against RAV Investigative & Security Services, LTD (“RAV”) (ECF No. 17), and his Memorandum of Law in Support of Request for Entry of Judgment Against RAV (ECF No. 18), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that: 1. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for back pay in the amount of $21,614. 2. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for compensatory damages in the amount of $2,500. 3. Judgment is entered against RAV and in favor of Sowell for punitive damages in the amount of $5,000. 4. Sowell may pursue a claim for prejudgment interest on back pay awarded within ten days of this Order. Such motion shall indicate the prejudgment interest rate to be applied, the 1 reason therefor, the prejudgment interest dollar amount sought, and the method of calculation. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?