LAMBERT v. ACE INA HOLDINGS, INC. et al
ORDER THAT LINA'S MOTION TO ENFORCE JURISDICTION, PARTIALLY STAY ARBITRATION AND ADJUDICATE THE PARTIES LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT CALCULATION DISPUTE IS DENIED. AS REQUESTED BY MR. LAMBERT AT ORAL ARGUMENT, THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/7/17. 2/7/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
J. SCOTT LAMBERT,
ACE INA HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
AND NOW, this
day of February, 2017, upon consideration ofLINA's Motion to
Enforce Jurisdiction, Partially Stay Arbitration, and Adjudicate the Parties' Long-Term
Disability Benefit Calculation Dispute (Docket No. 40), Plaintiff's Response thereto (Docket No.
41), and following an oral argument on December 13, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. LIN A's Motion (Docket No. 40) is DENIED.
2. As requested by Mr. Lambert at oral argument, the Complaint is DISMISSED
without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all
purposes, including statistics.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?