LAMBERT v. ACE INA HOLDINGS, INC. et al

Filing 44

ORDER THAT LINA'S MOTION TO ENFORCE JURISDICTION, PARTIALLY STAY ARBITRATION AND ADJUDICATE THE PARTIES LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT CALCULATION DISPUTE IS DENIED. AS REQUESTED BY MR. LAMBERT AT ORAL ARGUMENT, THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/7/17. 2/7/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

J. SCOTT LAMBERT,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
ACE INA HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

AND NOW, this

1

It:

No.15-3717

ORDER

day of February, 2017, upon consideration ofLINA's Motion to

Enforce Jurisdiction, Partially Stay Arbitration, and Adjudicate the Parties' Long-Term
Disability Benefit Calculation Dispute (Docket No. 40), Plaintiff's Response thereto (Docket No.
41), and following an oral argument on December 13, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. LIN A's Motion (Docket No. 40) is DENIED.
2. As requested by Mr. Lambert at oral argument, the Complaint is DISMISSED
without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all
purposes, including statistics.

1