EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPURTUNITY COMMISSION v. CROTHALL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Filing 27

ORDER of MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (ECF No. 26) that. DEFENDANT CROTHALL SERVICES GROUP, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 13) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ARGUE THE SUFFICIENCY OF CROTHALL'S RECORDS UNDER 29 C.F.R SS 1607.4(A) AT THE CLOSE OF DISCOVERY. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS.. PLAINTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISION'S ("EEOC") MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (ECF NO. 14) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ARGUE THE INSUFFICIENCY OF CROTHALL'S RECORDS UNDER 29 C.F.R SS 1607.4(A) AT THE CLOSE OF DISCOVERY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 6/28/2016. 6/28/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
CROTHALL SERVICES
GROUP, INC.
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 15-3812

ORDER
AND NOW, this ___28TH ____ day of June, 2016, it is ORDERED as follows:


Defendant Crothall Services Group, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13)
is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to argue the sufficiency of Crothall’s records
under 29 C.F.R. § 1607.4(A) at the close of discovery. Defendant’s motion is DENIED
WITH PREJUDICE in all other respects.



Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) Motion for Judgment
on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to argue the
insufficiency of Crothall’s records under 29 C.F.R. § 1607.4(A) at the close of discovery.

s/Anita B. Brody
____________________________________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.

Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:

Copies MAILED on _______ to: