WIGGINS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MRK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/22/16. 12/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED,. (jpd,)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
a/k/a STERLING CHAVIS,
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al.
0 R D E R
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, after
reviewing the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Henry S. Perkin (ECF No. 10) and Petitioner's
objections thereto (ECF No. 16), and for the reasons set forth
in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Petitioner's objections to the Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 16) are OVERRULED;
The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant
2254 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED with
A certificate of appealability shall NOT issue;
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case as
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?