BRADLEY v. POWELL

Filing 7

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(2) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. ALL JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 10/19/2015; AND TO THE EXTENT THAT DEFT DESIRES TO RENEW HIS MOTION AFTER JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY HAS CLOSED, HE SHALL DO SO BY NO LATER THAN 10/30/2015, ETC.SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/18/15. 9/18/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT V. BRADLEY, SR.,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-04025

Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT POWELL,
Defendant.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) (ECF No. 2), Plaintiff’s response in opposition
(ECF No. 4), and Defendant’s reply thereto (ECF No. 5), it is ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE so that Plaintiff may engage in jurisdictional
discovery limited to the issue of whether Defendant has minimum contacts in
Pennsylvania;

2.

All jurisdictional discovery shall be completed by October 19, 2015; and

3.

To the extent that Defendant desires to renew his Motion after jurisdictional
discovery has closed, he shall do so by no later than October 30, 2015. Plaintiff
may file a response by November 16, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.