CLASSEN v. NUTTER et al

Filing 61

ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS ONE (1) AND FOUR (4) (DOC. NO. 52) IS GRANTED; THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS ON COUNTS ONE (1), TWO(2), THREE(3), FOUR(4) AND SIX(6) (DOC. NO. 51) IS GRATNED; COUNT FIVE IS DISMISSED AS MOOT; AND THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT SIX (6) (DOC. NO. 53) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/4/17. 12/5/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSE CLASSEN

:
:
:
:
:

v.
MICHAEL NUTTER, et al.

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 15-4078

ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2017 for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1) the motion of defendants City of Philadelphia,
Louis Giorla, Michael R. Resnick, Blanche Carney, and Karen
Bryant for summary judgment on Counts One and Four (Doc. # 52)
is GRANTED;
(2) the motion of defendant Corizon Health for summary
judgment on Counts One, Two, Three, Four, and Six (Doc. # 51) is
GRANTED;
(3) Count Five is DISMISSED as moot; and
(4) the motion of defendant Aramark Corporation (a/k/a
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC) for summary judgment on
Count Six (Doc. # 53) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.