LUONGO et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT AS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT AS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 1/11/16. 1/11/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEPHEN B. LUONGO and STEVE
LUONGO’S TOWING, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,
TOMAS YATES, LOUIS G. VITALI,
JAMES P. RAYKOVITZ, ROBERT
REILLY, JUSTIN LANZA, DERRICK
WATFORD and ERIC J. TURK,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO.

15-4087

ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion to
Dismiss by Defendants Pennsylvania State Police, Tomas Yates, Louis G. Vitali, James P.
Raykovitz, Robert Reilly, Justin Lanza, Derrick Watford, and Eric J. Turk (collectively,
“Defendants”) (Docket No. 12), the Response of Plaintiffs Stephen B. Luongo and Steve
Luongo’s Towing, Inc. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) (Docket No. 13), Defendants’ Reply Brief
(Docket No. 14), and Defendants’ Notice of Recent Decision (Docket No. 15), it is hereby
ORDERED that Motion is GRANTED as follows:
1.

All claims against Defendant Pennsylvania State Police are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.

2.

Count I of the Complaint as against all Defendants DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.

3.

Count II of the Complaint as against all Defendants is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.
4.

Count III of the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs
shall have twenty (20) days from the date of this Order to file an amended
complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Court’s accompanying
Memorandum.

It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.