DAVID v. NEUMANN UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 11 ), IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 7 ), IS GRANTED AS OUTLINED HEREIN. LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/11/2016. 4/11/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDREA DAVID,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
NEUMANN UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 15-4098

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2016, after a hearing
with the parties on April 5, 2016, and for the reasons set forth
in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1)

Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply in
Further Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
(ECF No. 11) is GRANTED;

(2)

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) is
GRANTED;

(3)

Counts 1 and 2 of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No.
1) are DISMISSED without prejudice;

(4)

Count 3 of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1)
insofar as Plaintiff claims that Defendant
Neumann University violated Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 is
DISMISSED without prejudice;
1

(5)

Count 4 of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1)
insofar as Plaintiff claims that Defendants
Albaugh and Biely violated 42 U.S.C. § 1981 is
DISIMSSED without prejudice;

(6)

Count 3 of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1)
insofar as Plaintiff claims that Defendant
Neumann University violated Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 is DISMISSED with
prejudice;

(7)

Count 4 of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1)
insofar as Plaintiff claims that Defendants
Albaugh and Biely violated Title VI and Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is DISMISSED with
prejudice;

(8)

Leave to file an Amended Complaint is GRANTED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
J.

2