DAHL v. GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS [DOC. NO. 36] IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO COUNT IV, WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF WASHINGTON PUBLIC POLICY, AND THE CLAIM IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNT VII, TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT; COUNT VIII, SHAREHOLDER OPPRESSION AND PETITION FOR JUDICIAL DISSOLUTION; AND COUNT IX, INJUNCTION FOR INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/26/17. 7/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-4252
(TO BE DOCKETED IN 15-3528
PARTNERS, LLC, et al.,
AND NOW, this 26th day of July 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss [Doc. No. 36], and the response and reply thereto, and in accordance with the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED
IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
The Motion is GRANTED as to Count IV, Wrongful Termination in Violation of
Washington Public Policy, and the claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Motion is DENIED as to Count VII, Tortious Interference with Contract;
Count VIII, Shareholder Oppression and Petition for Judicial Dissolution; and
Count IX, Injunction for Inspection of Books and Records.
Defendants shall file an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 21
days of the entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?